It has been described as one of the largest scams of its type in the United Kingdom.
In all 14 people have been sentenced for their part in a £28m plot to swindle in excess of 3,500 holiday ownership investors.
The affected individuals were keen to exit decades-old vacation property deals and went looking for assistance.
A large number were from 60 and 80. More than 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and one transferred more than £80,000.
Those targeted were exposed to high-pressure consultations lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, owning worthless fake "rewards" and still trapped in costly vacation property deals they often use.
The company at the core of the fraud was the organization in question. They accepted customers' funds to finance the directors' opulent lifestyle of private schools, millionaire mansions and private jets.
The man at the head of the firm, the main defendant, was given a 90-month prison term in January for conspiracy to defraud.
In the latest development, his spouse one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to receive sentencing.
She was given a 24-month suspended jail sentence at Southwark Crown Court after admitting money laundering.
This has been a long time coming and marks a huge win for the victims who came forward, the authorities and the Crown.
I first heard about the company was in the that particular year. The position was in the research department of a news organization, making investigative programmes.
A friend mentioned that his mum had inherited the ownership of a vacation unit in the Spanish coast and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to exit the contract.
It's worth mentioning how widespread timeshares had grown with English tourists in the last decades of the 20th century.
Timeshares permitted families to access the identical property each season, or swap their vacation periods with fellow investors who had properties in other resorts. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that option.
The initial boom was linked to a numerous stories about rip-off merchants mis-selling investments. They appeared frequently on public interest broadcasts.
The typical vacation property deal tied investors in for long periods.
At that time, those investors who had enjoyed their regular accommodation in the resort for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and many were hoping to say farewell to their holiday properties.
A number had reduced ability to travel and couldn't get to their apartments. A few just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And some had died, in frequent situations bequeathing their heirs to inherit the agreements - plus their yearly fees and maintenance fees.
This was the situation the friend's mum had ended up. She browsed the internet for answers and discovered SMT, a business whose website claimed to release her from her agreement.
Yet, having submitted funds and arranged an appointment with them, her loved ones became suspicious.
Additional investigation showed many victims claiming they had handed over cash and got nothing in return. In fact, they had been left out of pocket. Significant sums.
Our team began investigating what was going on. It was rapidly apparent that there were some shady characters active in the timeshare resale sector.
An attorney had numerous client reports aiming to litigate against SMT.
The team interviewed people who had used the firm and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the firm would purchase their timeshare off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were advised there was no market for their property.
In place of that, they were encouraged - in fact coerced - to commit further cash investing in "the firm's incentive scheme", associated with the organization's holding firm, Monster Travel.
The nature of these rewards was rather ambiguous. They seemed similar to a form of credit, giving access to cheaper vacations and amenities and retail offers.
And they were seemingly "exchangeable with other owners, eventually.
Committing funds immediately would produce an future return that would cover SMT's fees and allow the timeshare holder with a gain, freed at last from their troublesome agreement.
An unbelievable offer? Indeed, it was.
Assuming these reports were true, this was a major deception.
This is known as a "bait-and-switch."
A business - specifically the company - "baits" the client by marketing a particular product but then to state it cannot be provided, pushing the customer in the direction of another, inferior option.
Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the accounts we had collected, we made the case to secretly film one of the company's meetings.
Such an operation demands dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to obtain the data needed to prove wrongdoing.
Once authorized, our limited crew arranged a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the English town.
Acting as a member of the public aiming to assist his parent free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
A seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience covering UK politics and social issues, known for insightful analysis.